Social cleansing of working class people and families has been going on apace ever since the selling off of council housing stock from under the Thatcher government. The issue of housing is probably the most important issue in England. Resolving the housing crisis by housing people in cheap affordable but decent and adequate housing would resolve many of the social and political tensions amongst the working class, especially racism. But we live in a capitalist system which would rather see greater divisions amongst working class people, and so are happy to see working class folk descend into precarious housing situations. Furthermore, this type of social cleansing benefits the richer classes in as much as it gets rid of working class people who might vote for candidates not to the liking of the status quo - for example left leaning politicos like Ken Livingstone are less likely to win elections, and also it is intended to reverse the growing working class, Black and Asian presence in central areas of London.
Like many other issues, working class people need an effective campaign to deal with these issues, but the state of the left and the general atmosphere of apathy in England is not conducive to building such campaigns.
There are people out there who are squatting for example, these are usually student/middle class type people, but its very important that black and working class people consider squatting while we still have some squatting rights in England.
This is a good example of squatting, and this group in South London has even managed to start housing working class families, it was reported on television that a South Asian working class couple with a small child has moved in, which is great news, as we know that more than 1,600 families in London are living in bed and breakfast type of housing.
Sukant Chandan, Sons of Malcolm
Benefits cap is forcing my pupils to quit heart of London, says head
Chelsea teacher attacks 'social engineering' as school's mix is changed by wealthier children
A primary school in the country's most affluent borough is making plans to cope with losing up to half its children in the wake of the benefits cap, which critics fear will make London unaffordable for thousands of families.
In the latest sign of the impact of the government's benefits reforms, Stephen Boatright, the headteacher at St Cuthbert with St Matthias Church of England school in Kensington and Chelsea, said he was making "strategic plans" to deal with an exodus. The loss of up to 100 pupils from the poorest families would force him to cut staff numbers and deal with a huge change in culture, he said.
The school currently has children of 55 nationalities and dozens of different languages, but Boatright said St Cuthbert could be unrecognisable as wealthier children replaced the poorest.
The £500-a-week benefits cap, which is due to be implemented in 2013, is expected to leave around 130,000 families across the capital unable to pay their rent. The royal borough of Kensington and Chelsea will be particularly hit by the changes because of its high rents and lack of social housing.
Boatright said that children from six families had already moved to live as far away as Nottingham and Hull. He said schools in Enfield, north London, where the costs of private accommodation were lower, were already taking in huge numbers of children.
"In terms of a policy, it seems to us to be a slight bit of social engineering," Boatright said. "It is removing children from the very heart of the city and they are going to be replaced by wealthier families and children. That makes our mix that much weaker. We don't know how many families will be affected because we don't know how many are in privately rented accommodation.
"But we do know that half of our children have free school meals. We know that social housing in the area is very limited, so we are making the assumption that some of our children whose parents don't work will have to move, and some of our parents who do work will have to move because the rents in this area are outrageous."
Kensington and Chelsea council has written to people in private accommodation whom it believes will be hit. More children from poorer families are expected to leave schools such as St Cuthbert in the coming months.
Boatright said: "It is a destruction of community because there is a strong Arabic-speaking community in this area, really good, fantastic parents, and the reason they moved to this area is so they could have community support. They will have to move to areas where that community support will not be available."
St Cuthbert, which received a satisfactory rating in its latest Ofsted inspection last year, has its funding judged by the number of pupils it has in January. Boatright said he believed the impact would be felt in 2014.
Sam Royston of the Children's Society said he expected the experience of St Cuthbert to be replicated across central London. "This demonstrates the reality of how children's lives are going to be affected by a policy that will inevitably leave them as the victims. It is of great concern that some schools are already faced with having to plan for an exodus of children. The government's own impact assessment indicates that approaching a quarter of a million children will be in families affected."
London Councils, an umbrella organisation for the 33 London boroughs, commissioned independent research to examine how plans to reform housing benefit will affect the capital. Researchers looked at the impact of the universal credit cap (which will limit the total amount families can claim in benefits to £500 a week), as well as the changes to local housing allowance, which will reduce the amount of housing benefit available to private sector tenants.
The report, Does the Cap Fit?, by Navigant Consulting, estimated in November that more than 130,000 London households may be unable to pay their rent.
A spokeswoman for London Councils said: "London is facing a housing crisis, with an acute shortage of affordable accommodation for low-income households. The latest figures show that there are already 1,680 households in bed-and-breakfast accommodation across London, and we expect this figure to rise."
A spokesman for Kensington and Chelsea council said: "Private rented accommodation in the borough is among the most expensive in the country, so it is inevitable that changes to local housing allowance will have a greater impact in this borough than many other areas."