"A quarter of the population of
I cannot start the new school year in my role as a teacher of Dutch in the prison of Saint-Gilles. I am writing to you, using the media as my intermediary, because you do not want to address this issue and meet with me, despite being asked to do so, on two separate occasions over the past year, by a
You and I met once.
It was in May 2009 when you organised, alongside your colleague minister Didier Reynders, a special day in Bozar,
I launched an appeal against participation in that day and for the organisation of a day on a different approach to crime and delinquency. When our paths crossed at the entrance of Bozar, I said to you: 'A quarter of the population of
After our discussion I asked myself what remained of the positions that you held in 1996. At that time, you published a text entitled 'The politics of prison sentencing' in which you were critical of policies based on imprisonment. You pleaded then for an alternative to incarceration, attacking the ineffectiveness of prisons for dealing with the issue of recidivism.
Looking back now, and with the benefit of hindsight, I find that I said nothing to you on the subject of the day of 'Prison Make' that you could not have read a year later in the report of the Council of Europe's Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) on the situation of the prisons in Belgium1. 'The Committee for the Prevention of Torture underlines that an increase in the prison capacity cannot in itself resolve the problem of prison overcrowding. In a number of countries -
Three months after our meeting, Mr. Meurisse, the Federal Director of Prisons, banned me from entering all the prisons in
You have chosen to cover the issue of this professional work ban before members of the multi-party justice commission of parliament. On 6 October, in response to a question from the Green MP Zoe Genot, you declared that 'The decision to forbid access was a considered one, based on an in-depth review of all the information. Such a measure is exceptional and would only be taken on the basis of substantial evidence. The decision to exclude for reasons of security is made on the basis of an assessment of the overall record of the individual and the security concerns are sufficient, in itself, to justify exclusion.'
Can you not see that such a statement is worthy of a police state? As Rik van Cauwelaert wrote in the Flemish magazine Knack2: ' The professional work-ban against Luk Vervaet, taken at it was on the basis of secret evidence, amounts to little more than a settling of accounts; through such a ban the State steals the work of a man who has in recent years made no secret of the inhuman conditions he witnessed in prisons... Only rogue states hide behind the national interest in order to silence those who think differently.'
If you really carried out an 'in-depth review of my file', than you learned that my professional record as a teacher in prisons was beyond reproach. What your decision rested on was a State Security report, which we finally managed to get hold of, but only thanks to a leak. In short, the report states that: 'Luk Vervaet is a member of CLEA (The Committee for Free Expression and Association, le Comité pour Liberté d'Expression et d'Association) and co-founder of the party Egalité. He is anti-Israeli and pro-Palestinian. He is opposed to the anti-terrorist legislation and defends those he sees as the victims of the legislation.'
More specifically, the State Security accused me of having defended the 'terrorist' Bahar Kimyongur and of opposing the conditions of detention of the 'terrorist' Nizar Trabelsi, as well as his proposed extradition to the
In addition, it would not have escaped you that on pages 42 and 44 of its report, the CPT takes to task Hans Meurisse , the Director of Prisons, for locking up those convicted on terrorism charges in special isolation sections that are absolutely not designed for this purpose. 'Over the last eighteen months, special units have been created (at the prisons of
It feels as though the prisons of
If the prison authorities, as well as you yourself, truly want to bring about greater security, then you should give me back my job and let me continue with my work as a teacher in prisons. Recommendation 1741 of the Council of Europe, which deals with the rehabilitation of prisoners, stipulates that 'The right to an education is a fundamental human right. Therefore, it is beholden on the prison authorities to take measures appropriate to the education of prisoners.'
So there is not only the question of security, but also one of education. And as far as security is concerned, the greatest security comes through investing in the creation of opportunities for people who have been deprived of opportunities in the past.
To get a glimpse of just what a farce education in prisons is in
The French community in
I conclude this letter by asking you once again to meet with me and grant me an interview. Failing that, I will have no other choice but to take my case to the Belgian Council of State and the European Court of Human Rights.
1Rapport au gouvernement de la Belgique relatif à la visite effectuée en Belgique par le Comité européen pour la prévention de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (CPT) du 28 septembre au 7 octobre 2009, Strasbourg 23 juillet 2010
2 Knack 4 november 2009